Saturday, February 28, 2015

Taxes will be lowered, but in the meanwhile, here's a hike.


The annual Economic Survey, published a couple of days before budget day, provides the context against which the Finance Minister makes his proposals. This year’s document was uncharacteristically enthusiastic about our situation, “The changing fortunes of India have been nothing short of dramatically positive”, with a decline in inflation, the shrivelling of the current account deficit, and a sharp recovery in economic growth.

This last has most economy-watchers surprised, since it is not supported by corporate results or tax collections; worse, if it is a statistical quirk, emerging out of the new method for calculating the GDP number, it may endanger the revenue estimates on which Mr. Jaitley’s second budget is based. Taxes collected by the government depend on economic growth, and if economic activity is over-estimated by the budget, government revenues will fall short of projections, putting a stress on the fiscal deficit, and demanding greater borrowing.

The Finance Minister has, in any case, disappointed those who believe in fiscal discipline, in pushing out by one year the date by which he will reduce the government’s fiscal deficit to 3%. He also postponed by a year the introduction of two fresh commitments - the implementation of the GST, and a reduction in income tax rates for companies, from 30% to 25%. Meanwhile, he had no hesitation in raising from 12 to 14% the incidence of service tax, a hike required for it to converge with the tax levels on goods.

And, though corporate tax will go down, at a date and rate to be notified, for the time being, it will go up. The Minister's speech said ‘rich’ individuals, defined as those with stated incomes over Rs. 1 cr per annum will pay an additional surcharge on income tax. Currently standing at 10%, this got hiked to 12%; what the Finance Minister did not say, but stands in the fine print, is that there is an identical hike for companies, as well. This additional surcharge is estimated to garner Rs. 9,000 crore for the exchequer. The only consolation is that Mr. Jaitley has abandoned the wealth tax, since it has not yielded the desired revenue.

Other initiatives that could be significant were mentioned, but not fleshed out, and would seem to be statements of intent, rather than specific proposals: these include easier bankruptcy laws, and a simplification of income tax rules governing individuals. Vague promises like these belong in an internal discussion or brain-storming, rather than on the floor of the house, and speak of incomplete homework, rather like declaring that yoga will be a charity. Someone will have to explain the budgetary significance of that to me, preferably while doing a headstand!

I don’t want to sound entirely negative about the budget, since there were two proposals in it that I really liked
- the first was that the employee contribution to the ESI (Employee State Insurance) Scheme will henceforth be optional. Anyone who has visited an ESI-run hospital will welcome this move. Mr. Jaitley’s remark about employees being hostage to the scheme was spot on. So are companies, and I wonder when he will make the employer’s contribution optional, too.
- the second was allowing ‘pass-through’ in Alternative Investment Funds* (AIFs), such that gains in these funds are not taxed in the hands of the individual investors, much as for mutual funds. India needs diversified sources of financing for new business ventures, and AIFs are particularly active in private equity and venture capital deals.

On the subject of funding investment, the most startling gap, to my mind, was in the area of funding public sector banks. The Economic Survey had this to say about their performance, “the best public sector banks perform well below private sector banks on average, recognising of course that PSBs may be burdened with greater social obligations that places them at a competitive disadvantage relative to the private banks. The subtler problem with public sector ownership is that exit from debt difficulties is proving very difficult.” Given the fact that PSBs account for over 70% of the banking sector, and their balance sheets are hugely stretched, I anticipated a huge commitment to enhancing their equity base. The number, at just under Rs. 8,000 crore, seems piffling, especially for an economy which is projected to grow at over 8%.

My editor at Outlook asked me how I thought this budget measured upto the expectations of a Big Bang. “0 on 10”, I answered. However, I had no such expectations, so I needed to assess it against  
more muted norms. I find it long on hope, but short on substance, and, I suspect, pinning too much on favourable winds in the larger world, most especially continued global liquidity, and low oil prices.

Fingers crossed.

*here's the reaction of TV Gopal, Chairman of TVS Capital:


  1. One of things worth mulling over is the reduced elbow room for the FM, with a 10% increase in centre-state divisions of taxes, scheme funds etc., the Finance Commission thing. This will inhibit resource commitment from the centre (they have less to play with). What should be interesting is what states do with the additional cash! I'm expecting renewed impetus to the Handouts Derby from many. The 10% is a lot of money to good work....or bad.

  2. True, Pras. Correspondingly, of course, this reduces the grants that the center has to give the states.